高级综合（HLS）释放了计算机架构师以非常低级的语言开发他们的设计，并需要准确指定如何在寄存器级别传输数据。在HLS的帮助下，硬件设计人员必须只描述设计的高级行为流程。尽管如此，它仍然可能需要数周才能开发高性能架构，主要是因为在更高的水平下有许多设计选择需要更多的时间来探索。它还需要几分钟才能从HLS工具上获得每个设计候选人的质量的反馈。在本文中，我们建议通过使用培训的图形神经网络（GNN）来建立HLS工具来解决这个问题，该工具被培训用于广泛的应用程序。实验结果表明，通过采用基于GNN的模型，我们能够以高精度估计毫秒的设计质量，这可以帮助我们非常快速地搜索解决方案空间。

虽然有很多关于图像深度学习的硬件加速研究，但在加速涉及图形的深度学习应用时，有一个相当有利的专注。图的独特特性，例如不规则的内存访问和动态并行性，当算法映射到CPU或GPU时，施加有几个挑战。为了在利用所有可用的稀疏性的同时解决这些挑战，我们提出了一种灵活的架构，称为SPA-GCN，用于加速图形卷积网络（GCN），在图中的深度学习算法中的核心计算单元。该架构专门用于处理许多小图形，因为图表尺寸对设计考虑产生了重大影响。在这种情况下，我们使用SIMGNN是一种基于神经网络的图形匹配算法，作为展示我们架构的有效性的案例研究。实验结果表明，与多核CPU实施和GPU实施相比，SPA-GCN可以提供高速度，显示设计效率。

Recent technological advancements in space, air and ground components have made possible a new network paradigm called "space-air-ground integrated network" (SAGIN). Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) play a key role in SAGINs. However, due to UAVs' high dynamics and complexity, the real-world deployment of a SAGIN becomes a major barrier for realizing such SAGINs. Compared to the space and terrestrial components, UAVs are expected to meet performance requirements with high flexibility and dynamics using limited resources. Therefore, employing UAVs in various usage scenarios requires well-designed planning in algorithmic approaches. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of recent learning-based algorithmic approaches. We consider possible reward functions and discuss the state-of-the-art algorithms for optimizing the reward functions, including Q-learning, deep Q-learning, multi-armed bandit (MAB), particle swarm optimization (PSO) and satisfaction-based learning algorithms. Unlike other survey papers, we focus on the methodological perspective of the optimization problem, which can be applicable to various UAV-assisted missions on a SAGIN using these algorithms. We simulate users and environments according to real-world scenarios and compare the learning-based and PSO-based methods in terms of throughput, load, fairness, computation time, etc. We also implement and evaluate the 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) variations of these algorithms to reflect different deployment cases. Our simulation suggests that the $3$D satisfaction-based learning algorithm outperforms the other approaches for various metrics in most cases. We discuss some open challenges at the end and our findings aim to provide design guidelines for algorithm selections while optimizing the deployment of UAV-assisted SAGINs.